Debt Thresholds and Economic Growth in Pakistan: Nonlinear Evidence from a Threshold-ARDL Model (1983–2023)

Authors

  • Khadija Zulfiquar MS Scholar, Department of Economics, COMSATS University, Islamabad,Lahore Campus, Pakistan
  • Rao Muhammad Atif Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-2296
  • Bushra Pervaiz Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Lahore Leads University, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-9465

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2025(6-I)47

Keywords:

Pakistan Economy, Debt Sustainability, Economic Growth, Debt Threshold Level

Abstract

This study examines how different threshold levels of public debt affect Pakistan’s economic growth and assesses the country’s overall debt sustainability. Debt can support economic growth when kept within sustainable limits, but it holds the economy back when countries resort to excessive borrowing. Using annual data from 1983 to 2023, the study employs a two-regime Threshold ARDL (TARDL) estimation approach to identify nonlinearities in the debt–growth relationship. The analysis identifies threshold ratios of 56.1% for total debt-to-GDP, 64.4% for total debt-to-gross national income, 245.27% for total debt-to-revenue, and 215.86% for total debt-to-exports of goods and services in Pakistan. Debt levels below these critical points generally support economic growth (with the exception of external debt indicators), whereas debt levels above them significantly constrain Pakistan’s growth performance. The findings stress that Pakistan should enhance its productive capacity, expand export potential, and improve debt management. It will ease its debt burden and protect long-term macroeconomic stability.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

Details

    Abstract Views: 26
    PDF Downloads: 3

How to Cite

Zulfiquar, K., Atif, R. M., & Pervaiz, B. (2025). Debt Thresholds and Economic Growth in Pakistan: Nonlinear Evidence from a Threshold-ARDL Model (1983–2023). Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 6(1), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2025(6-I)47