A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Mechanisms in Pakistan and Germany: Challenges and Best Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)57Keywords:
Comparative Analysis, Enforcement Agencies, Enforcement Patterns, Germany IPR Laws, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), IPR Protection, Pakistan IPR Challenges, Policy StrategiesAbstract
This research provides a comparative analysis of intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement in Pakistan and Germany, identifying key challenges and best practices. As the global economy becomes more knowledge-driven, effective IPR protection is crucial. Pakistan faces significant challenges, including weak legal frameworks, low awareness among stakeholders, and limited resources for enforcement. In contrast, Germany’s system is more advanced but faces issues like digital piracy and adapting to new technologies. Using a comparative analysis of legal systems, enforcement agencies, and judicial practices, along with case studies and survey data, the study highlights Germany’s strengths in specialized IP courts and public awareness campaigns. Pakistan’s IPR protection remains limited in comparison. The study recommends Pakistan should adopt Germany’s specialized IP courts and awareness initiatives, while Germany should focus on addressing the challenges posed by digital piracy. Strengthening public-private partnership is emphasized as a key strategy for improving IPR enforcement in both countries.
Downloads
Published
Details
-
Abstract Views: 42
PDF Downloads: 18
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Annals of Human and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS) & Annals of Human and Social Sciences (AHSS) adheres to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in AHSS agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International license). Under this license, the authors published in AHSS retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of AHSS are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. Therefore, RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS) & Annals of Human and Social Sciences (AHSS) follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.