Divide and Rule: How British Policies Contributed to Communal Tensions in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2025(6-I)02Keywords:
British Policies, Communalism, Divide and Rule, Partition of IndiaAbstract
This paper examines how the outcomes of British colonial policies, particularly the Divide and Rule strategy, contributed to the rise of communal tensions in India. Building on the framework of colonial policies, the study discusses key measures, including the Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909, the Partition of Bengal in 1905, and the Communal Award of 1932, highlighting their detrimental effects on religious and social integration. Employing historical, descriptive, and analytical research methods, this dissertation draws upon primary sources, official documents, and historical writings to trace the evolution of communalism under British colonial rule. The study reveals that institutionalised communal representation, selective empowerment, and the management of socio-religious identities fostered mistrust among various communities. To address these enduring colonial legacies in contemporary South Asia, the research suggests three critical interventions: historical reconciliation, inclusive education, and interfaith dialogue. The findings underline the profound and long-term socio-political implications of colonial divisiveness on the regional order, offering insights into the enduring challenges posed by these historical strategies.
Downloads
Published
Details
-
Abstract Views: 8
PDF Downloads: 3
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Annals of Human and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS) & Annals of Human and Social Sciences (AHSS) adheres to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in AHSS agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International license). Under this license, the authors published in AHSS retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of AHSS are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. Therefore, RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS) & Annals of Human and Social Sciences (AHSS) follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.